the nothing of everything

ask away I suppose.Next pageArchive

I love how we imagine God as some normal ass guy and satan is this goat ass motherfucker who is barely humanoid…. when, if you think about it, Satan is much closer to human then God.

whycantithinkofacoolname:

sillylaureate:

theknighttoyourtime:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

image

image

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

image

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

image

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

image

image

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

image

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

image

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo? 

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

image

Thank you for your time.

image

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

image

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

image

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

image

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

image

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

image

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

image

image

image

image

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

image

image

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog? 

image

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

image

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

image

image

Rather unlikely!

image

Actually, Mr. Godot!! 

image

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

image

image

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

image

image

Hold on there, pups. You’re all going in completely different directions. Shih-na, if you will?

image

image

Lang Zi says: “The truth lies not at the exit, but rather, shines outside the maze itself.”

You need to see past the boundaries given to you in order to figure out the actual purpose and, as much as I’d hate to admit, both Mr. Prosecutor and the crow-girl have some pretty tame ground under their feet with those assumptions.

image

As said before, it’s logical to assume the photographer is merely depicting the method used in order to get the results shown in the second photo—and it can be just that.

But what if it’s something else entirely?

image

We’re all wolves who’ve been swindled by the coyote that has stolen our kill. How do we know if the photographer just isn’t using some clever ploy to get us all confused? He could have taken these pictures separately and simply put them together with getting us riled up in mind.

I think we all need to reconsider our options, here.

Casually brings it back.

amazing use of gifs, ladies and gentleman

(via dotalpha)

xchromewolf:

OHMYGODWHAT

This brings me more joy then anything on Tumblr…. so I just have to keep reblogging

I’m so glad I found my perfect woman.

Now I have no reason to have to interact with the 99.9% of worthless moron’s that make up this world.

random rambling

I have always viewed wolves as my favorite animal. For as long as I can remember. But when I think of a my spirit, I know it isn’t the wolf. It seems everyone thinks their spirit animal is the wolf. Strong symbolism for any life style really.

But no, I know what mine is. Something smaller but close. Something not masculine or threatening. Something not viewed as strong and noble like the wolf. I’ve always known it to be a fox.

I handle all my problems with charisma and a grin that hides my sinister nature. I am a people person, but not by choice. Every one unwisely trusts me, views me as a caring and kind individual. But back me in a corner, threaten me or what I hold dear, just remember there are sharp teeth in that grin.

Anyone who meets me in real life loves me. Any one who meets me on the internet hates me…. well I guess its better then the other way around eh?

There is an extreme difference.

ferretplay:

vaticanhound:

And I fucking mean EXTREME difference between hating radical feminist and hating women. I mean in comparable to a rational mind. There is even a great difference between hating radical feminist and hating feminist.

I do not hate anyone due to their gender, race or religion. I agree that in many aspects women are not being treated equally and that fucking sickens me. Rape is by far the worse thing any one can do to a fellow human in my beliefs. All humans are born equal and society tries to rob them of that.

No I am not a feminist, I am a god damn human.

Feminist try to bring this to the light. Which I support. Feminist try to merely get respect for women and true equality. I support that. Feminist are peaceful and don’t wish to rob others, merely get what is deserved, good on them too.

Radical feminist are fucking immature ignorant fuckwads. They find hatred towards women in places it doesn’t exist. They not only send the movement backwards with their generalizations and aggression, but they also lose respect for the movement. No one will listen to some yelling and belligerent mother fucker who fucking says all men are evil or all men rape.

Honestly why the fuck would we. You can’t fucking fight a fucking candle with a flamethrower. No one will respect you if you generalize, make shit up and victimize freely. Attacking men will not make them respect you or treat you any better.

Now I know fucking Rad fem will generalize this with “You just hate women.” Or “Of course you think this way, you fucking worthless man.” Even though any half baked moron can tell that is just the typical rad fem way of biased ignorance. So send your hate mail, but know that I have never met a none rad fem who did not fucking hate rad fems. Men, women, and even plently of feminist hate them. So I guess you guys made us equal in hate for you worthless mother fuckers.

To recap: I support women. I support feminist. I hate rad fems. Hating rad fems is in no way generalized to hating women, but rad fems will still write hate mail and hate reblogs saying that it is….cause they are ignorant and vile.

( O and feel free to send all the hate you want, really fucking do it. Cause like I said, fighting hate with hate has worked so fucking well, no?)

“No I am not a feminist, I am a god damn human.”

lol because the two are mutually exclusive

“Radical feminist are fucking immature ignorant fuckwads. They find hatred towards women in places it doesn’t exist. They not only send the movement backwards with their generalizations and aggression, but they also lose respect for the movement. No one will listen to some yelling and belligerent mother fucker who fucking says all men are evil or all men rape.”


Bolded is mine because….I mean do you see at all what might be happening here?

These really long rants I have no energy to take seriously but they make me laugh so much I can’t help pressing reblog.  

“Hating rad fems is in no way generalized to hating women”

hahah are they a different species? A gender all their own? You do know they’re women right? Like for real, I promise.  And it’s sort of obvious what you meant sure, but I mean…learn how to write coherently maybe? lol

and the very end? Are you like just super desperate for messages? Cuz that’s sad.  

#sofunny

Hahahaha o God this is a fucking joke right? You either ment to take shit out of context and twist it or you are some form of special retardation. But let me break it down for you since I have the time.

I am not a feminist, I am a human. AKA meaning biologically all humans are born with innate compassion to some degree, regardless of gender. further breaking it down, I am saying you don’t have to be a feminist to feel for women.

And by saying hating rad fems is not generalizing…. well I dont think you understand basic speech. I am saying I dont hate women because I hate rad fems. Because so many rad fems use that excuse when someone is tired of their shit. I am saying that rad fems are a culture while women are a gender and not linked.

But look. I know you will never respect me. I can live with that actually. There is nothing I can ever do, so why try? But all that petty bullshit aside.

Thank you.

Thank you for handling it maturely. I am an asshole in your eyes, mind you for disagreeing, but still you didn’t jump down my throat like most of any belief or culture do when they disagree on the internet.

So in recap. You took my words and twisted them. You basically wanted to make a fool out of a fellow human. I don’t give a fuck. But at the same time, I have a wee bit of respect for your manners. (I know you dont give a shit if I have any respect for you, save your breathe)

(via )

There is an extreme difference.

And I fucking mean EXTREME difference between hating radical feminist and hating women. I mean in comparable to a rational mind. There is even a great difference between hating radical feminist and hating feminist.

I do not hate anyone due to their gender, race or religion. I agree that in many aspects women are not being treated equally and that fucking sickens me. Rape is by far the worse thing any one can do to a fellow human in my beliefs. All humans are born equal and society tries to rob them of that.

No I am not a feminist, I am a god damn human.

Feminist try to bring this to the light. Which I support. Feminist try to merely get respect for women and true equality. I support that. Feminist are peaceful and don’t wish to rob others, merely get what is deserved, good on them too.

Radical feminist are fucking immature ignorant fuckwads. They find hatred towards women in places it doesn’t exist. They not only send the movement backwards with their generalizations and aggression, but they also lose respect for the movement. No one will listen to some yelling and belligerent mother fucker who fucking says all men are evil or all men rape.

Honestly why the fuck would we. You can’t fucking fight a fucking candle with a flamethrower. No one will respect you if you generalize, make shit up and victimize freely. Attacking men will not make them respect you or treat you any better.

Now I know fucking Rad fem will generalize this with “You just hate women.” Or “Of course you think this way, you fucking worthless man.” Even though any half baked moron can tell that is just the typical rad fem way of biased ignorance. So send your hate mail, but know that I have never met a none rad fem who did not fucking hate rad fems. Men, women, and even plently of feminist hate them. So I guess you guys made us equal in hate for you worthless mother fuckers.

To recap: I support women. I support feminist. I hate rad fems. Hating rad fems is in no way generalized to hating women, but rad fems will still write hate mail and hate reblogs saying that it is….cause they are ignorant and vile.

( O and feel free to send all the hate you want, really fucking do it. Cause like I said, fighting hate with hate has worked so fucking well, no?)

I don’t hate all feminists by the way.

chuis-flyee:

For instance the user ofdustandrust is what a feminist should be. She respects other people’s opinions while still disagreeing and being able to logically defend her views.
She does not preach hate, or racism. Just equality.
She is one of the few feminists on tumblr that I respect. While I disagree with some of her opinions I respect them, and her.

tl;dr - stop hate.

(via chuis-flyee-deactivated20130419)